360Learning pricing: cost per user, the Team plan and 2026 comparison

The $8 Team rate reads cheaply until you put it next to platforms billed on a different unit. Here is the same three headcounts across every platform on this page that publishes a rate. Registered-user pricing is shown at full headcount, because that is what registered means.

Two lessons come out of that grid. First, the billing unit swings the answer more than the rate does. At 100 employees where only 60 log in during a given month, a per-registered-user platform bills 100 and a per-active-learner platform bills 60, a forty percent difference on identical usage. Second, published pricing tends to stop somewhere between 500 and 1,000 people on almost every platform, so a large buyer ends up in a quote regardless. The question is whether you can build the shortlist before that point.

For a fuller treatment of how the unit sets the bill, see our enterprise LMS pricing breakdown, and for the mid-market view the corporate LMS pricing guide.

This is the most consequential detail on the 360Learning pricing page and it is easy to walk past. On the feature comparison matrix, single sign-on carries an asterisk and appears only in the Business and Enterprise columns. The Microsoft Teams or Zoom webinar integration carries the same asterisk and the same restriction. Neither is included in the published Team plan.

Follow that through for a real buyer. A 70-person US company reads $8 per user per month, works out $6,720 a year, and takes that to finance. Then IT applies the standard policy that every SaaS tool authenticates through Okta or Entra ID. The company now needs Business, which carries no published price, and the $8 anchor described a plan it was never able to buy.

That does not make 360Learning expensive or dishonest. It makes the published number a poor planning figure for any company with an identity provider, which is most companies above about 30 people. If you are evaluating it seriously, ask for the Business quote at the start of the process rather than after a pilot, and ask specifically what SSO adds per user.

The pattern repeats across the category in different shapes, and we mapped where each vendor sets its gate in LMS integrations by plan. For contrast, TalentLMS ships SAML 2.0, LDAP, Active Directory and OpenID Connect on its cheapest paid tier at $119 a month.

Team is linear and simple up to its cap. Above the cap there is nothing published, so the figures below switch from arithmetic to reported ranges, and they are labeled as such.

The last row is the one buyers miss. The move to Business is triggered by a feature requirement, not only by headcount, so a 40-person company with an identity provider is in the same quoting process as a 400-person one.

Team is billed monthly with no annual commitment and can be cancelled anytime, which is genuinely unusual in this market and worth something on an unproven program. Almost every competitor here requires an annual contract, and several require a multi-year one.

On Team the unit is simple: per user, per month. On Business and Enterprise, 360Learning describes flexible user models that combine registered users and monthly active users in a single contract to support internal and external learners.

That flexibility is real and it can work in your favor, particularly if you train customers or partners alongside staff and the external audience logs in sporadically. It also makes two quotes hard to compare, because the blend is negotiated rather than published. Ask for the split in writing: how many registered seats, how many monthly active users, what the overage costs, and whether crossing the active-user line mid-term bills immediately or waits for renewal.

Compare that to the units used elsewhere. Docebo bills yearly active users, which for a company running one mandatory annual course converges on total headcount. Continu bills monthly active users and states that inactive users do not count toward the plan limit. Sana bills every provisioned seat whether or not it is used. The same 500-person company can produce wildly different billable numbers across those four definitions, which we work through in enterprise LMS pricing and active versus registered user pricing.

For head-to-head context, see TalentLMS vs 360Learning, Docebo vs 360Learning, Absorb LMS vs 360Learning and 360Learning alternatives.